USPTO serial 76343917
KAVA BONES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAVA BONES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM E. JOHNSON, JR.
WILLIAM E JOHNSON JR THE MATTHEWS FIRM1900 W LOOP S STE 1800HOUSTON, TX 77027UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | EDIBLE CHEWS FOR ANIMALS | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |