USPTO serial 76344305
QUALTIER TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUALTIER TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sharon K. Sandeen
ANNE F FERGUSON HUNTER RICHEY DIBENEDETTO & EISENBEIS, L520 CAPITOL MALL, STE 1400SACRAMENTO, CA 95814UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer consultation related to the installation, maintenance and updating of computer software for small businesses | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |