USPTO serial 76344589
CASCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CASCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William R. Robinson, Bruce S. Londa, Davy E. Zoneraich, Jeanne M. Hamburg
William R. Robinson, Bruce S. Londa, Davy E. Zoner Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A.875 Third Avenue18th FloorNew York, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Unmodified corn starch used as an ingredient in the manufacture of beer; used as an ingredient in the manufacture of infant foods and foods for medically restricted diets; used as an ingredient in the manufacture of processed foods in the nature of dry mixes; used as an ingredient in the manufacture of confectionery food items in the nature of aerated candies, caramels and toffees and chewing gum; used as an ingredient in the manufacture of baked goods in the nature of cakes and cake donuts, icings and glazes, pie and donut fillings and prepared mixes; and used as an ingredient in the manufacture of blended spices | ABANDONED | Feb 9, 1990 |
| 005 | Unmodified corn starch sold as integral component of infant foods and foods for medically restricted diets | ABANDONED | Feb 9, 1990 |
| 029 | UNMODIFIED CORN STARCH SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF PROCESSED FOODS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CHEESE AND MEAT | ABANDONED | Feb 9, 1990 |
| 030 | Unmodified corn starch sold as an integral component of processed fruit and dry mixes consisting primarily of gravies; unmodified corn starch sold as an integral component of confectionery food items in the nature of aerated candies, caramels and toffees and chewing gum; as an integral component of baked goods in the nature of cakes and cake donuts, icings and glazes, pies and donut fillings and prepared mixes and as an integral part of blended spices | ABANDONED | Feb 9, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Corn Products International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Corn Products International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CASCO
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |