USPTO serial 76344803
MULTI-USE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MULTI-USE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MINERAL RESOURCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
HOUSTON, TX
Other trademarks owned by MINERAL RESOURCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Mineral Resource Technologies, LLC
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by Mineral Resource Technologies, LLC
Mineral Resource Technologies, LLC
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by Mineral Resource Technologies, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly Gambrel
Kimberly Gambrel Dinsmore & Shohl LLPOne South Main Street, Suite 1300DAYTON, OH 45402-2058UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | fly ash for use as land fill stabilizers, aggregates, and fillers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MINERAL RESOURCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Mineral Resource Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Mineral Resource Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named MULTI-USE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |