Drawing for FAST FLASH

USPTO serial 76344967

FAST FLASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAST FLASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Mortimer

JOHN S MORTIMER WOOD, PHILLIPS, VANSANTEN ET AL500 W MADISON STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60661UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL BUILDING FLASHING AND PARTS THEREFORACTIVE—
019NON-METAL BUILDING FLASHING AND PARTS THEREFORACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 8, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 19, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 19, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2002CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance