Drawing for LAUNCH

USPTO serial 76345009

LAUNCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAUNCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen R. Baird

Stephen R. Baird Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.225 South Sixth StreetSuite 3500Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Games, playthings and sporting goods, namely, collectible toy figures and action figures and action figure accessories, talking toy figures, electronic or mechanical toy batons, toy milk caps, wind-up-toys, plush toys, toy vehicles, dolls and role-playing game equipment in the nature of male action toys and models, activity sets and playset environments comprised of mini figures/scene displays, toy figures, and spin-top toys, all offered in connection with an animated television seriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 13, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 27, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 3, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance