Drawing for BOSS RABBIT

USPTO serial 76345079

BOSS RABBIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOSS RABBIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen R. Baird

Stephen R. Baird Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.225 South Sixth StreetSuite 3500Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Games, playthings and sporting goods, namely, collectible toy figures and action figures and action figure acessories, talking toy figures, electronic or mechanical toy batons, toy milk caps, wind-up-toys, toy vehicles, dolls and roll-playing game equipment in the name of male action toys and models, activity sets and playset environments comprised of mini figures/scene displays, toy figures, spin-top toys; Electronic toys, namely coin-operated video games; hand held unit for playing video games; stand alone video game machines; stand alone video output game machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance