USPTO serial 76345104
OMNIBRAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OMNIBRAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Persson
MICHAEL J PERSSON LAWSON, PHILPOT & PERSSON, PC67 WATER ST STE 100LACONIA, NH 03246UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Soldering and brazing flux; namely metal and chemical fluxes for use in soldering and brazing; brazing and soldering paste, kits containing metal and chemical flux; and soldering and brazing flux extruded into shapes for manufacturing applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Soldering and brazing filler metal; namely wire, metal rings, and formed shapes of metal and alloy metal for use in soldering and brazing; kits containing filler metal and metal alloys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |