USPTO serial 76345265
LELY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3325059Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LELY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
3155 PD Massland, NL
3155 PD Massland, NL
3155 PD Massland, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S. JACOBSON
DAVID S. JACOBSON GORDON & JACOBSON PC60 LONG RIDGE RD STE 407STAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ CHEMICALS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CLEANING AGENTS, HYGIENIC PRODUCTS AND DISINFECTANTS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2001 |
| 003 | GERMICIDAL DETERGENTS, CLEANING PREPARATIONS, CLEANING AGENTS, HYGIENIC SOAPS, AND SOAPS FOR DAIRY FARMING AND MILK PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2001 |
| 005 | HYGIENIC PRODUCTS, NAMELY DISINFECTANTS, PESTICIDES AND FUNGICIDES FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF DAIRY FARMING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maasland N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Maasland N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Maasland N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named LELY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 30, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 20, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |