USPTO serial 76345273
LELY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LELY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
3155 PD Maasland, NL
3155 PD Maasland, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID P. GORDON
DAVID P GORDON GORDON & JACOBSON PC60 LONG RIDGE RD STE 407STAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in the manufacture of cleaning agents, hygienic products and disinfectants | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Germicidal detergents, cleaning preparations, cleaning agents, hygienic soaps, and soaps for dairy farming and milk production equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Hygienic products, namely, disinfectants, pesticides, and fungicides for use in the field of dairy farming | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely miniature vehicles, miniature agricultural machines and miniature tractors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maasland N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Maasland N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LELY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |