USPTO serial 76345336
MAXIMUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIMUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PURVI J. PATEL
PURVI J PATEL HAYNES & BOONE901 MAIN ST STE 3100DALLAS, TX 75202-3789UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Railcars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of TRN Business Trust., a Delaware Business Trust, the trustees comprising Timothy R. Wallace, Jim S. Ivy and Michael G. Fortado, all U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of TRN Business Trust., a Delaware Business Trust, the trustees comprising Timothy R. Wallace, Jim S. Ivy and Michael G. Fortado, all U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named MAXIMUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |