USPTO serial 76345373
AEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Steven Kurlowecz
JOHN L DUPRE HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, PC530 VIRGINIA RD PO BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for integrating end-to-end business process solutions for the process industries, | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing training for computer software for integrating end-to-end business process solutions for the process industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support for computer software for integrating end-to-end business process solutions for the process industries; design of computer software for others and consulting for computer software for integrating end-to-end business process solutions for the process industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |