USPTO serial 76345386
TOUGH STUFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOUGH STUFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Roxanne Elings
G ROXANNE ELINGS GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | ACTION SKILL GAMES, ACTION-TYPE TARGET GAMES, CHILDREN'S PARTY GAMES, AERO-DYNAMIC DISK FOR USE IN PLAYING CATCHING GAMES, ARCADE GAMES, BALL GAMES, BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, COIN-OPERATED VIDEO GAMES, GAMES IN THE NATURE OF OUTDOOR ACTIVITY, PADDLE BALL GAMES, PARLOR GAMES, ROLE PLAYING GAMES, FIGURE ACTION TOYS, BATTERY-OPERATED ACTION TOYS, BENDABLE TOYS, ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS, FANTASY CHARACTER TOYS, MECHANICAL ACTION TOYS, PLASTIC CHARACTER TOYS, RUBBER CHARACTER TOYS, SOFT SCULPTURE PLUSH TOYS, SOFT SCULPTURE TOYS, TOY ARROWS, DISC TOSS TOYS, BABY MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, BATH TOYS, CRIB TOYS, INFANT DEVELOPMENT TOYS, PLAY MATS CONTAINING INFANT TOYS, PLUSH TOYS, POP UP TOYS, PULL TOYS, PUNCHING TOYS, PUSH TOYS, RIDE-ON TOYS, SQUEEZABLE SQUEAKING TOYS, SQUEEZE TOYS, STUFFED TOYS, TALKING TOYS, TOYS DESIGNED TO BE ATTACHED TO CAR SEATS, STROLLERS, CRIBS AND HIGH CHAIRS, WIND-UP TOYS, WIND-UP WALKING TOYS, CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY TABLES CONTAINING MANIPULATIVE TOYS WHICH CONVERT TO EASELS, CHILDREN'S WIRE CONSTRUCTION AND ART ACTIVITY TOYS, DRAWING TOYS, PRINTING TOYS, CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, CONSTRUCTION TOYS, NON-RIDING TRANSPORTATION TOYS, INFLATABLE RIDE-ON TOYS, INFLATABLE TOYS, MECHANICAL TOYS, MUSIC BOX TOYS, MUSICAL TOYS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS, SAND TOYS, WATER SQUIRTING TOYS, DOLLS AND DOLLS' CLOTHING; ACCESSORIES FOR DOLLS; DOLLS' HOUSES; DOLLS' FURNITURE; DOLLS' FURNITURE ACCESSORIES; TEDDY BEARS; TOY ACTION FIGURES; TOY VEHICLES; TOY BUILDING BLOCKS, TOY VEHICLE TRACKS; CASES FOR PLAY ACCESSORIES; BALLOONS; TOY MASKS; DECORATIONS FOR CHRISTMAS TREES; PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |