USPTO serial 76345446
ENTEL CALL CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENTEL CALL CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
MICHAEL D. FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER, PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVENUESUITE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Operation of telephone and Internet communication centers for others; customer service centers for others; telemarketing services for others; billing services for others; telephone and Internet product/service order services for others; telephone and Internet direct marketing services for others; client management services for others, namely preparing business reports about the requirements, activities and interests of others' clients | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |