USPTO serial 76345605
LEOPARD'S CHASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEOPARD'S CHASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OCEAN RIDGE PLANTATION GOLF, INC.
OCEAN ISLE BCH., NC
Ocean Isle Beach, NC
Ocean Isle Beach, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Mauney
MICHAEL E MAUNEYP O BOX 10266SOUTHPORT, NC 28461UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Golf course services | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OCEAN RIDGE PLANTATION GOLF, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ocean Ridge Golf, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ocean Ridge Golf, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LEOPARD'S CHASE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |