USPTO serial 76345795
WINE AWAKENINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2993583Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WINE AWAKENINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Niagara Falls, Ontario, CA
Niagara Falls, Ontario, CA
Niagara Falls, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Debra Pascale
3850 POTTER HEIGHTSNIAGARA FALLS, ON L2J 3C9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Brochures, pamphlets, newsletters in the field of wine education and kits comprised of printed wine information booklets and aroma and scents in liquid form for wine education | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |