USPTO serial 76345956
MEDIACLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2885597Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MEDIACLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIA V HARDISON
MARIA V HARDISON TASSAN & HARDISON4143 27TH ST NARLINGTON, VA 22207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEB-BASED ELECTRONIC CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR OTHERS TO CREATE, DEVELOP, IMPLEMENT, EDIT, SECURE, MANAGE, AND PUBLISH WEBSITE CONTENT; INTERNET WEBSITE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC SYNDICATION SERVICES CONSISTING OF THE SUPPLYING OF CONTENT FOR THE WEBSITES OF OTHERS AND UPDATING OF SAID CONTENT FOR OTHERS; INTERNET WEBSITE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION, NAMELY, INTERNET CONSULTING SERVICES AND INTERNET CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO WEBSITES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Comspec Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Comspec Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Comspec Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MEDIACLAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |