USPTO serial 76345971
ROUTE DU RHUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROUTE DU RHUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75009 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY W. LEEDS
HENRY W LEEDS DRINKER BIDDIC & RATH LLP1500 K ST NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER DIAL-UP AND DEDICATED ACCESS TO THE INTERNET; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; TRANSMITTING STREAMED SOUND AND AUDIOVISUAL RECORDINGS FOR OTHERS VIA THE INTERNET; HOSTING OF DIGITAL CONTENT ON THE INTERNET FOR OTHERS; BROADCASTING PROGRAMS VIA THE INTERNET, TELEVISION, AND CABLE TELEVISION; COMMUNICATIONS BY COMPUTER TERMINALS, NAMELY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF WEATHER INFORMATION, POSITIONS AND RANKINGS, PRESS RELEASES; SPECIAL NEWS FLASHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PRODUCTION OF MOTION PICTURE FILMS, VIDEOCASSETTES AND TELEVISION AND CABLE TELEVISION PROGRAMS; TIMING OF SPORTING EVENTS; CLUBS, NAMELY NIGHT CLUBS AND WATER SPORTS CLUBS, NAMELY, YACHTING AND SAILING CLUBS; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING COLLOQUIUMS, CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELDS OF EDUCATION, CULTURE, SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT; ORGANIZATION OF SPORTS COMPETITIONS; ORGANIZATION OF CULTURAL EXHIBITIONS IN THE NATURE OF YACHT RACES AND BOAT SHOWS; ORGANIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL EXHIBITIONS IN THE FIELDS OF YACHTING AND SAILING; ORGANIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL COMPETITIONS IN THE NATURE OF YACHT RACES; ORGANIZATION OF ENTERTAINMENT COMPETITIONS IN THE NATURE OF YACHT RACES; SPORTS CAMPS; TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS; ORGANIZING WATER SPORTS COMPETITIONS AND REFEREEING OF AND OFFICIATING AT WATER SPORTS COMPETITIONS; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |