USPTO serial 76346257
SPEEDSUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEEDSUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
LORI STOCKTON BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic delivery of third party content, namely, electronic transmission of HTML source, static and dynamic data, documents, text, graphics, databases, and audio and video material, rich embedded documents, text, graphics, databases, and audio and video material, streaming audio and video material, and computer software applications from a content delivery network; providing multiple user and computer network access to a global and local computer networks | ABANDONED | Dec 4, 2001 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software, and user manuals sold as a unit therewith, for use in viewing, monitoring, testing, reporting, analyzing, and accelerating Internet traffic, content delivery, website failover, and streaming media; computer network management, namely monitoring, testing, reporting, analyzing, and accelerating Internet traffic, content control, and advanced logging; monitoring, reporting, and managing website performance for others; maintaining websites for others, namely, global load balancing and detecting and resolving website errors and failures; website failover services, namely, monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities | ABANDONED | Dec 4, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |