USPTO serial 76346292
ARCTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 9, 2003
- Examiner
- ALVES, RICHARD
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARCTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-9015 St. Gallen, CH
CH-9015 St. Gallen, CH
CH-9015 St. Gallen, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E Shapiro
Ronald E Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills RoadSuite 740Fairfax, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | SANDING, POLISHING, LACQUERING, LAMINATING AND GRINDING MACHINES FOR USE IN PRODUCING A SMOOTH SURFACE QUALITY ON GLUED SHEETS, WOOD PANELS, SHEET METALS, BOXES, SHEETS OF PAPER, PLASTIC SHEETS, AND RUBBER SHEETS; AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY ROLLERS, SLIDING SHOES, AND CYLINDERS WITH NON-ABRASIVE SURFACES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ MANUFACTURING CONSULTATION, namely, CONSULTING OTHERS IN PRODUCING A SMOOTH SURFACE QUALITY ON GLUED SHEETS, WOOD PANELS, SHEET METALS, BOXES, SHEETS OF PAPER, PLASTIC SHEETS, AND RUBBER SHEETS THROUGH SANDING, POLISHING, LACQUERING OR LAMINATING ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Steinemann Technology AG
- Other trademarks owned by Steinemann Technology AG
- Other trademarks owned by Steinemann Technology AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ARCTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |