USPTO serial 76346580
DOMAINADMIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2937048Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2005
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DOMAINADMIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa-ken, JP
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. BADAGLIACCA
MICHAEL J BADAGLIACCA STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, EMBEDDED COMPONENT OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR OPERATING SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION AND DATABASE MANAGEMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 2, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |