USPTO serial 76346646
SPRING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPRING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell P. Brook
CHERYL A WITHYCOMBE BAKER & MCKENZIE101 W BROADWAY 12TH FLSAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs or software, namely, computer software for developing business applications and deploying business applications; computer software for rapid application development of business applications; computer software for developing and deploying business applications for the Internet and across an organization; computer software platform for business application development and deployment; user manuals and instructional manuals sold as a unit; and user manuals and instructional manuals electronically delivered via computer software and via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |