USPTO serial 76347272
DICKHOUSE PRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DICKHOUSE PRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lonesome Roads Inc., Jeff Tremaine and Spike Jonze, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lonesome Roads Inc., Jeff Tremaine and Spike Jonze, Inc.
Lonesome Roads Inc., Jeff Tremaine and Spike Jonze, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lonesome Roads Inc., Jeff Tremaine and Spike Jonze, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH A. FEINSWOG
KENNETH A FEINSWOG6100 CENTER DR STE 630LOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game and electronic game programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Stickers, rubber stamps, notebooks, coloring books, comic books, wrapping paper, greeting cards, series of comic books, books, note pads, paper party decorations, pencils, pens, postcards, stationery, trading cards, calendars, playing cards and posters | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Shirts, bandannas, pants, caps, hats, visors, footwear, outerwear, namely, jackets; underwear; belts; pajamas and Halloween costumes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Board games, children's toy play house, Christmas tree decorations, inflatable toys, stuffed toys, toy action figures, toy balloons, toy balls, toy dolls, toy puppets, plush toys, hand held unit for playing electronic games and toy puzzles excepting crossword puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lonesome Roads Inc., Jeff Tremaine and Spike Jonze, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lonesome Roads Inc., Jeff Tremaine and Spike Jonze, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named DICKHOUSE PRODUCTIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |