Drawing for DICKHOUSE PRODUCTIONS

USPTO serial 76347272

DICKHOUSE PRODUCTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DICKHOUSE PRODUCTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KENNETH A. FEINSWOG

KENNETH A FEINSWOG6100 CENTER DR STE 630LOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game and electronic game programsACTIVE—
016Stickers, rubber stamps, notebooks, coloring books, comic books, wrapping paper, greeting cards, series of comic books, books, note pads, paper party decorations, pencils, pens, postcards, stationery, trading cards, calendars, playing cards and postersACTIVE—
025Shirts, bandannas, pants, caps, hats, visors, footwear, outerwear, namely, jackets; underwear; belts; pajamas and Halloween costumesACTIVE—
028Board games, children's toy play house, Christmas tree decorations, inflatable toys, stuffed toys, toy action figures, toy balloons, toy balls, toy dolls, toy puppets, plush toys, hand held unit for playing electronic games and toy puzzles excepting crossword puzzlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 26, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 12, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 17, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 26, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance