USPTO serial 76347322
REWIRING - NOT RETIRING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REWIRING - NOT RETIRING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Byrne
JOSEPH W BYRNE BOARDMAN, SUHR, CURRY & FIELD LLP1 S PINCKNEY ST FOURTH FLP O BOX 927MADISON, WI 53701-0927Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter and instructional and teaching materials, namely, books, magazine articles, newspaper articles, brochures, pamphlets, reports and manuals, all featuring information regarding pre-retirement and retirement issues | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting classes, seminars, workshops, conferences and speeches regarding pre-retirement and retirement issues and providing course materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lehmann, Richelle
- Other trademarks owned by Lehmann, Richelle
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named REWIRING - NOT RETIRING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |