Drawing for FLORISCAPE

USPTO serial 76347328

FLORISCAPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLORISCAPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G ROXANNE ELINGS

G ROXANNE ELINGS GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016(Based on Intent to Use) Printed instructional, educational and teaching materials in the field of water conservation, namely in landscape planning and developmentACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting workshops, lectures, and providing educational materials to the public and in field of environmental conservation, namely water conservationACTIVE—
042Consultancy services in the field of water conservation, namely providing guidelines and recommendations for responsible water use; association services; namely, promotion public awareness of use and conservation of waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 13, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 19, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance