USPTO serial 76347336
OPTIMUM SLIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIMUM SLIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Delta, British Columbia, CA
Delta, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS M. GALGANO
THOMAS M GALGANO GALGANO & BURKE300 RABRO DR STE 135HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NATURE'S PATH FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NATURE'S PATH FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named OPTIMUM SLIM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |