USPTO serial 76347497
RADIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RADIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST N W STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Technical services for wireless, broadcast, and wireline communication companies and government and military communication users, namely, installation, maintenance, and repairs of self-supporting towers, guyed towers, rooftop antennas, monopoles, antenna mounts, cellular, microwave, broadcast and trunked radio systems; construction of communications towers; land development, planning and laying out of sites for communication equipment; construction consultation services in the field of sites for communication equipment; consultation services, namely, providing consultation to others in the construction of telecommunications facilities and infrastructure; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of repair of telecommunications facilities, infrastructure and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | MANUFACTURE OF COMMUNICATION TOWERS TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Consultation services, namely, providing consultation to others in the area of design of telecommunications facilities and infrastructure; technological consultation services in the technology field of telecommunications network systems; consultation in the field of telecommunications equipment testing and inspection; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with telecommunications facilities, infrastructure and equipment; engineering and design for others of communications networks and broadcast towers; engineering of broadcast transmission equipment; design for others of telecommunications equipment, namely, self-supporting towers, guyed towers, rooftop antennas, monopoles, antenna mounts, and cellular, microwave, broadcast and trunked radio systems and networks therefor; computer systems integration services for data, video and voice networks in the field of telecommunications; consulting in the field of wireless and wired network engineering | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Radian Communication Services Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by RADIAN COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES (CANADA) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RADIAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |