USPTO serial 76347541
RSSM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RSSM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Skop
Douglas A. Miro Ostrolenk Faber Gerb & Soffen, LLP1180 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-0681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, books, newsletters, reports, journals, manuals and guides in the fields of accounting, auditing, tax, management consulting, business, financial management and analysis | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 035 | Bookkeeping and general accounting services; fiduciary accounting services; forensic accounting services, business auditing services, fraud auditing services; tax preparation, planning and consulting services; budget and business management consulting services; business strategy and business plan consulting services; merger, acquisition and divestiture consulting and advisory services, business valuations and appraisals, human resource consulting services, executive compensation and retention consulting services, executive search consulting services | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 036 | Employee benefit consulting services; deferred compensation and retirement plan design, implementation and review for others; estate and succession planning services, estate and trust management services, charitable gift planning services, general and personal financial planning services, financial management consulting including analysis, design, development and implementation of financial management systems; real estate consulting services, financial consulting and advisory services, actuarial consulting services, financial analysis | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rosen Seymour Shapss Martin & Company LLP
- Other trademarks owned by Rosen Seymour Shapss Martin & Company LLP
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named RSSM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |