Drawing for FRANCK MULLER

USPTO serial 76347561

FRANCK MULLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRANCK MULLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Wasnofski, Jr.

Robert M. Wasnofski, Jr. Dorsey & Whitney LLP51 West 52nd StreetNew York, NY 10019-6119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003PERFUMES AND PERFUMERY, TOILETRIES, NAMELY LIPSTICK, LIP LINER, MASCARA, EYE SHADOW, LIP GLOSS, FACE POWDER, BODY AND FACE GLITTER, ESSENTIAL OIL FOR PERSONAL USE, COSMETICS AND HAIR LOTIONSACTIVE—
009OPTICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY SPECTACLES, SUNGLASSES, SPECTACLES FRAMES AND SIDE PIECES, SPECTACLES GLASSES AND SPECTACLE CASESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 30, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance