Drawing for OK JEANS COUTURE

USPTO serial 76347569

OK JEANS COUTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHEFFIELD, SHARI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OK JEANS COUTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles M. Marmelstein

CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003PerfumesACTIVE—
014JewelryACTIVE—
018Hand bags and back packsACTIVE—
025Men's women's and children's jeans and apparel, namely pants, shorts, skirts, dresses, t-shirts sweaters, shirts, blouses, jackets, coats, underwear, hats, caps, shoes, boots, and beltsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 13, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 19, 2006LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
May 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 9, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance