USPTO serial 76347619
GARDEN DIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3177352Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GARDEN DIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonard J. Charney
LEONARD J CHARNEY11 E 44TH ST 9TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going television, video and internet programs series in the field of gardening, recipes, crafts, aromotherapy, decorating and entertaining, educational services, namely, conducting workshops and public lectures in the field of gardening, recipes, crafts, aromotherapy, decorating and entertaining | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 10, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 19, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |