USPTO serial 76347688
WORKFLOW WIZARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORKFLOW WIZARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harry M. Thomson, Jr.
HARRY M THOMSON JR5027 HARTWELL DRHOUSTON, TX 77084-2367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and accompanying printed materials for use with exploration and production technology in the oil and gas and environmental industries and geophysical and geological applications, applied as a utility in computer software for arranging the data environment in streamlining tasks for drilling, seismic and geological data and associated business operations in drilling and production organization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX1M | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX1D | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |