USPTO serial 76347900
KURITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KURITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Water treatment chemicals in the pulp and paper industries; namely, chemicals for the control of bacterial and fungal slime; oxygen scavenger chemicals for use in industrial, municipal and waste water treatment; chemical adsorbents for specialized refrigerant dehydration and filtration; industrial water treatment chemicals, namely corrosion inhibitors, oxygen scavengers, boiler treatments, scale inhibitors, biocides, waste water coagulants, and waste water flocculants; chemicals for industrial use, namely, corrosion inhibitors for boilers; chemicals for treating boiler feed water; synthetic ion exchange resins for general industrial uses, including, but not limited to, water softening agents, water de-ionization agents, water de-alkalization agents, desiccants, chelating agents, catalysts, and chromatographic agents | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Supervision of construction work for water treatment equipment; installation; maintenance; repair and drive management of water treatment equipment; boiler cleaning and repair; construction of water disposal and waste water treatment facilities; rebuilding machines that have been worn or partially destroyed | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Purification of soil and groundwater contaminants; water treatment; waste treatment; recycling of ion exchange resin; recycling of membrane filter; boiler making; destruction of waste and trash; paper finishing; paper treating; recycling of waste and trash; sorting of waste and recyclable material; incineration of waste and trash; custom manufacture and production of water treatment equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |