Drawing for EDGEFILER

USPTO serial 76348441

EDGEFILER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDGEFILER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE MARKET SPEAR ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009File servers dedicated to perform a single function; related computer hardware and software for use in managing, distributing, storing, and securing large volumes of data over filers and computer networks, and instructional and user manuals sold therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 30, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 27, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 4, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance