USPTO serial 76348617
ONEVOICE MEDICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONEVOICE MEDICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. RAM
MICHAEL J RAM KOPPEL & JACOBS555 ST CHARLES DR STE 107THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91360UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | KNOWLEDGE BASED SOFTWARE SYSTEMS UTILIZING VOICE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY FOR GENERATING WRITTEN AND ELECTRONIC PATIENT MEDICAL RECORDS, COMPARING GENERATED RECORDS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS, MEDICAL STANDARDS AND BILLING DOCUMENTS FOR ELECTRONIC FILING FOR FEE REIMBURSEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | KNOWLEDGE BASED SOFTWARE SYSTEMS UTILIZING VOICE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY FOR GENERATING WRITTEN AND ELECTRONIC PATIENT MEDICAL RECORDS, COMPARING GENERATED RECORDS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS, MEDICAL STANDARDS AND BILLING DOCUMENTS FOR ELECTRONIC FILING FOR FEE REIMBURSEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |