Drawing for PUDDIN' ICE

USPTO serial 76349093

PUDDIN' ICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUDDIN' ICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Bacon

JOHN A BACON BAKER & MQKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZSTE 3500 130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Freezable liquid for use in making frozen confectionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 30, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 2, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 2, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 22, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance