USPTO serial 76349103
CARECARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2909457Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2004
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CARECARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dover, DE
BALTIMORE, MD
BALTIMORE, MD
Covington, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA M. CASEY
Stanton J. Lovenworth, Esq. Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP1301 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADMINISTRATION OF A DISCOUNT PROGRAM FOR ENABLING PARTICIPANTS TO OBTAIN DISCOUNTS ON GOODS AND SERVICES THROUGH USE OF A DISCOUNT MEMBERSHIP CARD | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Genesis Holdings, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by NEIGHBORECARE HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NEIGHBORECARE HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NEIGHBORECARE HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CARECARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |