Drawing for VALUE THROUGH PARTNERSHIP

USPTO serial 76349127

VALUE THROUGH PARTNERSHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALUE THROUGH PARTNERSHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David C. Kocab

DAVID C KOCAB CLARK HILL PLC500 WOODWARD AVE STE 3500DETROIT, MI 48084UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance services for residential and commercial mortgage lenders, namely, lender-placed hazard, flood, earthquake, wind and homeowners' insurance; blanket portfolio insurance for second position loans; home equity and second mortgage origination insurance protecting lender's security interest following default; property and casualty insurance; mortgage impairment insurance; lending discrimination liability insurance; blanket insurance for mortgage insurers; directors and officers liability insurance; errors and omissions insurance; employment practice liability insurance; insurance for hard to place commercial and residential properties otherwise unable to be covered by admitted carriers; flood hazard determinations and certificationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 2, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 10, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance