Drawing for SIRIUS 100% COMMERCIAL-FREE MUSIC

USPTO serial 76349502

SIRIUS 100% COMMERCIAL-FREE MUSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIRIUS 100% COMMERCIAL-FREE MUSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erica D. Klein

ERICA D KLEIN KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP1177 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Equipment for receiving broadcast radio transmissions, namely, radios, tuners, decoders, demodulators, receivers and antennasACTIVE—
035Computerized online retail services in the field of musicACTIVE—
038Broadcasting services, namely a multi-channel radio service broadcast directly to vehicles and stationary objectsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 27, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 28, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 21, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance