USPTO serial 76349527
Serial No. 76349527
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76349527?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, ON, CA
MISSISSAUGA, ON, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
MISSISSAUGA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER ESQ MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY &701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Hygienic paper products, namely, bathroom tissue | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PRODUCTS L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PRODUCTS L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Scott Paper Limited
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |