USPTO serial 76349778
DAIRY DUETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAIRY DUETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
DALLAS, TX
Other trademarks owned by DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
DALLAS, TX
Other trademarks owned by DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bridget G. Johnson
BRIDGET G JOHNSON SUIZA FOODS CORPORATION2515 MCKINNEY AVE STE 1200DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk, whipping cream, buttermilk, half and half and other dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by DEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Suiza Dairy Group, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Suiza Dairy Group, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Suiza Dairy Group, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Suiza Dairy Group, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named DAIRY DUETS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |