USPTO serial 76349852
E-WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton Amster
MORTON AMSTER AMSTER ROTHSTEIN90 PARK AVE FL 21NEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | wearable portable audio/video products, namely, digital camcorders, digital still cameras, digital audio players and digital voice recorder; liquid crystal display viewers for the viewing of videos, namely, video monitors and dot-matrix sd-enabled printers for printing digitally recorded video images | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |