CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EVERYDAY YOPLAIT

USPTO serial 76349862

EVERYDAY YOPLAIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BATTLE, KENNETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERYDAY YOPLAIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie BERTAGNOLLI

LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk and milk products, namely beverages made from milk products, yogurts, and fresh cheesesACTIVE—
030Desserts made from milk products, namely ices, custards, frozen yogurts, milk shakes, dairy puddings, dairy jellies, cream desserts, and cooked dairy dessertsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 5, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance