USPTO serial 76349893
SMART-START
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART-START?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Quinn
ANDREW QUINN SONY ELECTRONICS INC16530 VIA ESPRILLOMZ 7345SAN DIEGO, CA 92127Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video camcorders and related product package consisting of a video camcorder, battery power and charger adapter, battery, camcorder case, camcorder tripod and guide therefor; personal digital assistants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |