Drawing for THE POWER OF KABBALAH

USPTO serial 76349949

THE POWER OF KABBALAH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE POWER OF KABBALAH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H. COX

WILLIAM H COX JANVEY, GORDON, HERLANDS, RANDOLPH & COX355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Series of prerecorded audio and video tapes featuring instruction in the ancient teachings of Jewish spirituality and mysticismACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 11, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 11, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 22, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 2, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Jun 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance