USPTO serial 76350078
BIO SPECIFIC ACTIVE SENSITIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIO SPECIFIC ACTIVE SENSITIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
56200 La Gacilly, FR
Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
56200 La Gacilly, FR
Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
La Gacilly, FR
Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert H. Finn
HERBERT H FINN GREENBERG TRAURIG, PCSTE 250077 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601-1732Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated cosmetics, namely, makeup and skin care preparations for moisturizing, cleansing and improving the appearance of the body and face, namely, face, hand, body, and foot creams, lotions, toners, gels and scrubs, anti-wrinkle and anti-aging preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires De Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BIO SPECIFIC ACTIVE SENSITIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |