Drawing for Serial No. 76350179

USPTO serial 76350179

Serial No. 76350179

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76350179?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith A. Vogt

KEITH A VOGT NIRO, SCAVONE, HALLER & NIRO, LTD181 W MADISON STSTE 4600CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power tools, namely, cordless drills, cordless circular saws, drills, flashlights, circular saws, upright drills, screwdrivers, rotary hammers, miter saws and reciprocating sawsACTIVEJun 30, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance