USPTO serial 76350365
DR. THEISS ALERGOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2804060Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2004
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DR. THEISS ALERGOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear
Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CREAMS, SKIN LOTIONS, NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, AND NON-MEDICATED STIMULATING LOTIONS FOR THE SKIN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | NASAL SPRAY PREPARATIONS, DECONGESTANT NASAL SPRAYS, AND EYE WASH IRRIGATING SOLUTIONS FOR EYE USE, ALL ALLERGY RELIEF MEDICATIONS, ALLERGY MEDICATIONS, ALLERGY TABLETS, ALLERGY CAPSULES, FOOD SUPPLEMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Phyt-Immun GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Phyt-Immun GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Phyt-Immun GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named DR. THEISS ALERGOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |