Drawing for METROGUIDE

USPTO serial 76350454

METROGUIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METROGUIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER KELLY

CHRISTOPHER KELLY DINEEN P. WASYLIKWILEY REIN & FIELDING LLP1776 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Travel services, namely, providing information and services via a global computer network for the arrangement of travel, lodging, hotels, shopping, dining, events, car rental, and real estate for groups and individualsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 8, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 2, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 29, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 29, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 25, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance