USPTO serial 76350516
BRONSKILL.XPD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRONSKILL.XPD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY ET AL12010 SUNSET HLS RDSTE 900RESTON, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software namely customized software to facilitate the systematic valuation and development approach to target marketing and methodology for evaluating customer and/or fan experience/ responsiveness | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | development, to client specification, of a systematic valuation and developmental approach to target marketing and methodology for evaluating customer and/or fan experience/responsiveness | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bronskill Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Bronskill Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BRONSKILL.XPD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |